
When one thinks of Left4Dead, what is the first word that pops in your head? Hell it may not be the first word, but a some point “zombie” is sure to surface. Also, you might say, violent… This frames what will be our discussion: real-life vs fictional violence and zombies.
Each of these topics can be thoroughly exhausted, but what got me writing on this topic was the recent classification of Left4Dead 2 by the Australian ratings board (their version of the ESRB) as “refused classification”. This essentially means Valve’s zombie hit will not be able to be sold unless changes are made to the final product.
Why was it refused? It’s all in the terminology. In Left4Dead you play against the “infected”.
“The game contains realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence which is inflicted upon “the Infected” who are living humans infected with a rabies-like virus that causes them to act violently.”
So the infected are living humans and not living corpses. As Fidgit editor, Tom Chick points out, “Since the Infected aren’t dead, since they’re simply sick, there’s a much different moral quandary when it comes to killing them. It’s a whole different kind of violence!”
And there lies the difference: Shooting sick granny, over bloodthirsty, violence induced granny causes you to act morally different. And for the developing psyche of an adolescent, who knows what damage may be done coupled with their loud rock music and loose morals. *points to DDN younguns* This is clearly someones issue, but I’m not sure why. I can understand if in the course of zombie/infected hunting you have a story track where you get to shoot the non-infected human, thereby making you a de facto death panel, but games are games right?
I think the bigger argument encapsulated in this is: “think of the children”. As a now, dusty semblance of an adult; I can argue parents should watch what their kids buy and monitor them so that if they find something objectionable, take it away. However as a kid, when my parents didn’t want me to watch Bevis and Butthead I just went over to a friends house. The same can be said for videogames. What really strikes a cord with me is I consider this unnecessary regulation and censorship. While I’m glad it isn’t in my home country, much like the German assault to videogames, I consider it my personal duty to rant.
It bothers me, but is it really that important? Similar to how American standards of decency have changed over time, do you think I should just cool my heels? In the grand scheme of things it doesn’t directly affect me.